DLMS Client installed in RUT 906, connected DLMS Meter via serial RS485 2 wire all setting done signal ok no error. But Actual Data Not received in Test Result.
Hello,
Just to confirm, could you tell us if the following topic is the same exact issue as yours?
Are you also receiving data, but it’s empty?
Regards,
M.
Test Result like this without data
{
“error”: 0,
“result”: {
“Reactive energy import +R (QI+QII)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Active energy import +A (QI+QIV) L2”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Reactive energy +Ri (QI)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Energy |AL1|+|AL2|+|AL3|”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“ActiveEnergyExp-Q2-Q3”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Reactive energy -Ri (QIII)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Reactive energy -Rc (QIV)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Apparent Energy export -VA Q2-Q3”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Apparent energy import +VA (QI+QIV)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Active energy import +A (QI+QIV)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Total harmonic energy import”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“EnergyImport”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Reactive energy +Rc (QII)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Active energy import +A (QI+QIV) L1”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Active energy import +A (QI+QIV) L3”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Reactive energy export -R (QIII+QIV)”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
},
“Total harmonic energy export”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
}
}
}
Could you kindly provide an image of the wiring, please?
Thank you,
M.
This is the same issue I’m experiencing via TCP communication to a meter with the DLMS Client.
RS485 connection (D+ Blue, D+ Brown)
Received clock data but not other value
{
“error”: 0,
“result”: {
“Clock”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“1”: “0”,
“2”: “01/00/1900 00:00:00 UTC+00:00”,
“3”: “-1”,
“4”: “255”,
“5”: “00:00:00 UTC+00:00”,
“6”: “55552 00:00:00 UTC–25:-36”,
“7”: “-1”,
“8”: “255”,
“9”: “255”
}
},
“EnergyImport_L1”: {
“DLMS-2”: {
“2”: “”
}
}
}
}
Summary
This text will be hidden
Do you have a solution for getting data?
@VictordeBeer ..Do you have a solution for this problems? How to resolve.
Hello,
@prabhu5992 , we’re still waiting on Victorde’s feedback to a solution that we’ve proposed to them so we can’t say for certain that the resolution is 100% a fix here.
Here’s what the R&D had to say when they were analyzing Victorde’s setup:
Client has a meter that uses
short name referencing
instead oflogical name referencing
, because option use_ln_ref is 0 . However, for the cosem, he uses OBIS code0.0.42.0.0.255
which should only be used for logical name referencing. He should be using short name reference (something like1234
)
Regards,
M.
Hi @MatasR , I did not receive this feedback. I will have a look and post any findings.
@MatasR - any feedback on this?
Hi there,
Will pass this information to the R&D if you do any further tests, kindly email me.
Regards,
M.
Hi all @MatasR @VictordeBeer
Good day
I tested further Short name instead of OBIS code (6 digi)…now reading Clock value is correct , Energy Value need to convert the actual value and still we observing
@VictordeBeer could you double check your settings and see if they’re any similar to prabhu5992’s? Especially the OBIS code & short name, since you didn’t post your Device parameters.
You can use the “Scan” functionality in our device to get all available objects and check if the short names are correct.
Could you confirm that this is the solution to the issue and that it works as expected now?
Regards,
M.
This topic was automatically closed 2 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.