Could you clarify the goal of this network configuration? I’m curious why there’s a Teltonika router between the Mikrotik and Sungrow Logger. What’s the purpose of this setup? Could you provide a bit more insight on how this network topology looks like?
What is the purpose of the Teltonika router? Why do we need two LTE routers on one network? Is it for redundancy? Also, which device serves as the DHCP server?
It is hard to understand what suggestion you need. Can you elaborate on this more?
I am still working on it. I try to explain it better. We are SaaS platform that provides high-level SCADA.
We signed a contract with a client who had a solar farm. They have an LTE router that they are using.
They didn’t want to give us access to this router and requested us to provide the new device with our own internet access.
So, the situation before our installation looked like this:
LTE Router 192.168.1.1 (DHCP server)
Logger 192.168.1.110 (gateway 192.168.1.1)
Controller 192.168.1.90 (no gateway configured)
We wanted to add our device (TRB140) with independent internet to proxy traffic from our cloud to the Logger and Controller. So, we configured our gateway with static local IP (192.168.1.2) and disabled DHCP.
The current situation is that the connection with the Controller works properly. We can configure the port forward, and everything is ok.
The problem is with the logger, where I can send requests from the Modbus client (from UI). Everything is ok, but the port forward doesn’t work. So the communication from the TRB140 to Logger is possible. The only thing that doesn’t work is routing from WAN to LAN.
Hello, you can try to set “Masquerade” for lan zone. This will fix source address from your cloud and Contoller will think that he is communicating with TRB.
Network->Firewall