Problem setting WAN and LAN port in different VLANs on RUT200

[Andrushka]

I am trying to set the WAN and LAN ports as different port based VLANs in RUT200.

I have a port based VLAN configuration of:
VLAN1 LAN (untagged) WAN (off)
VLAN2 LAN (off) WAN (untagged)

I then have two LAN interfaces set up:

lan - Type bridge - member interface eth0.1
lan1 - Type bridge - member interface eth0.2

What I then see with tcpdump is any traffic going into the WAN port is visible on the lan bridge, not the lan1 bridge, even though eth0.2 is a member of lan1.

Traffic in the other direction from the lan1 bridge does appear correctly on the WAN port

For the LAN port traffic in both directions is on the lan bridge.

Any ideas why this should be and if it can be resolved?

[Justinas]

Greetings,

Could you please provide screenshots of your VLAN and LAN interface configurations?

Also, could you clarify your use case? Just to confirm my understanding, do you want to use the WAN port as a LAN port and assign it to a different LAN interface?

Best Regards,
Justinas

[Andrushka]

Hello, yes that is correct - two LAN interfaces:
LAN is for local router management
LAN1 is for traffic via Bondix Layer 2 tunnel.

See attached screenshots

[Andrushka]

Any update?